| |
Home
|
|
 |
Messages
|
|
| |
Chat
|
|
| |
Files
|
|
| |
Photos
|
|
| |
Links
|
|
| |
Database
|
|
| |
Polls
|
|
| |
Members
|
|
| |
Calendar
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Promote
|
|
| |
| |
| |  = Owner | |
| |  = Moderator | |
| |  = Online | |
|
|
|
From:
"Bruce Hutchinson" <bhutch@g...>
Date: (Date Unavailable)
Subject: [AAR_Skeptics] Sighting Report, Apr 14
|
Hey "Joe"- check this out!
From the UFO Updates List:
Background: There were a couple List Members complaining that
the only UFO cases considered "important enough" to discuss at
length were hackneyed old cases like Roswell, Lakenhurst, Alien
Autopsy, etc. The complainants went on to wonder why recent
sightings do not get the same respect.
This was Bruce Maccabee's response...
>From: Bruce Maccabee <brumac@c...>
>To: UFO UpDates - Toronto <ufoupdates@v...>
>Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 23:10:56 -0400
>Subject: New Triangle Photo Case
>
>Dear Listers:
>
>There have been recent discourses on the present status or 'fate'
>of ufology, like, why are people still discussing old cases, and
>aren't there any new ones worth haggling over, etc.
>
>Well, time marches on.
>
>Pelican guano may be covering old cases, but not yet the new
>ones. So, before the excrement hits the rotating blades, check
>out the newest night time photo of a triangle... and a "car"....
>that passed through the sky of Lawton, OK. They say Oklahoma is
>OK... and so, it appears, is this sighting.
>
>What do you think? (You are, therefore you think.... I
>think....)
>UFO UpDates Archives are available at
>The Virtually Strange Network:
>
>http://www.virtuallystrange.net/
|
|
|
