Yahoo!
Groups Home - Yahoo! - Help



Welcome, Guest Register - Sign In 
AAR_Skeptics [ Join This Group! ]
Yahoo! Web Hosting
Build a Better Website
  Home  
* Messages  
  Chat  
  Files  
  Photos  
  Links  
  Database  
  Polls  
  Members  
  Calendar  
 
 
  Promote  
 
 
  owner = Owner 
  moderator = Moderator 
  online = Online 
 
 
 Messages Messages Help
Reply | Forward | View Source | Unwrap Lines
 
  Message 271 of 626  |  Previous | Next  [ Up Thread ] Message Index
 
 Msg #
From:  Michael Davis <mdavis19@i...>
Date:  Fri Jun 14, 2002  11:43 pm
Subject:  Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Fw: kook


Carl Wilson wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: paul mcmahon
> To: webmaster@k...: Friday, June 14, 2002
> 11:50 AMSubject: kook
> I am just writing in response to your
> http://kook-watch.net/nancy/ page. Everyone has their own
> opinions and well yours is quite dedicated. I just have
> to say a couple things in response to that page. First of
> all I do not believe what nancy and the zeta's are
> expressing is in anyway related to the other three figures
> on that page. What nancy is trying to do is prove an
> existance of another planet, which may or may not come in
> the year of 2003 to do some damage. She is not informing
> mass ammounts of people to come to a farm house so they
> can use psychokinetic power to disable out of reach
> objects, or come drink this cup filled with magic potion
> that (tends to kill) releases you from this boring place
> we call earth. The only thing she offers is a chance to
> prepare (physically or mentally) for something may or may
> not come. So your very out of date page definately needs
> some updating. Wether you do your research and still see
> the negative side of what she has been trying to express,
> or you see the positive side, that is up to you. Where
> you stand does not affect my beliefs at all, and probably
> not much to anyone else but those who just dont believe in
> much. But I am sure it matters a lot to you :) no need to
> respond to this email I tend not to check it, just use
> itand yes I know what wether in that context means :)

Cool! Looks like I am getting the zeta kooks whipped into a
froth.

It should be interesting to see how the cult deals with the
failure of Nutty Nancy's prophesy in the next year.

--
Michael Davis



  Message 271 of 626  |  Previous | Next  [ Up Thread ] Message Index
 
 Msg #
Reply | Forward | View Source | Unwrap Lines


Copyright © 2002 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help