| |
Home
|
|
 |
Messages
|
|
| |
Chat
|
|
| |
Files
|
|
| |
Photos
|
|
| |
Links
|
|
| |
Database
|
|
| |
Polls
|
|
| |
Members
|
|
| |
Calendar
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Promote
|
|
| |
| |
| |  = Owner | |
| |  = Moderator | |
| |  = Online | |
|
|
|
From:
"Carl Wilson" <carl@k...>
Date: Sun Jun 16, 2002 3:53
am
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Arctic Wolf is Robert Wolfe
|
----- Original Message -----
From: "Diamondmaster1" <diamondmaster1@a...>
To: <AAR_Skeptics@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Arctic Wolf is Robert Wolfe
> > Well John, it looks like you were right about Arctic Wolf being another
> one
> > of Robert Wolfe's sock puppets.
> >
> > See:
> >
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?ie=UTF8&oe=UTF8&as_umsgid=3D0A36D5.BD1DF080@
> > www.genetics.pitt.edu&lr=&hl=en
> >
> > Robert answers questions clearly directed at "Arctic Wolf".
> >
>
> So far he doesn't try to draw as much attention to the AW persona as he
did
> to the fc4whatever alias that he uses. My guess is that he either doesn't
> realize that he's given himself away, or doesn't think anyone can make the
> connection.
>
> It's not really a big deal either way--what I enjoy is the occasional slip
> when he answers one persona with the other. That's one worth pouncing on
> when it happens; my particular shot is going to come when he pops off
about
> how debunkers avoid answering question once again--and I hit him with the
> Bearden stuff he probably thinks everyone has forgotten about.
I suspect he'll try to ignore you on that issue as well. He took a real
beating on that one, and is probably glad that topic faded out.
> He's made a BIG mistake with the Kempo stuff he's been spouting. Notice
how
> he hasn't tried to engage me after I quoted Ed Parker? Everyone else he's
> pretty much had comments for--but me he's never addressed, because I think
> he suddenly realized he was dealing with one of the professors rather than
> the students this time.
He did seem to be in a hurry to drop that whole conversation. He seems to
be limited to his posts that "atheists can't be skeptics" for the time
being.
> Good indicator was how he never rose to the bait I dangled in front of him
> concerning "my money is on Carl" when I said I had a good idea of your
> training vs anyone else in a fight.
I really expected him to really start frothing on that one, but he ignored
it like it was never posted! ;-)
> Lately, poor Robert seems to have degenerated into Wholeflaffer syndrome;
> all he can do is bluster like a grade-schooler.
>
> John
He seems to be posting less frequently in general the last few days.
(Including sock puppets). I suspect he might try to use the tried and
tested tactic of kooks everywhere on Usenet: Disappear for awhile (or post
very infrequently at least) and then come back and act as if he's "won" all
the old arguments, or pretend that they never happened.
|
|
