| |
Home
|
|
 |
Messages
|
|
| |
Chat
|
|
| |
Files
|
|
| |
Photos
|
|
| |
Links
|
|
| |
Database
|
|
| |
Polls
|
|
| |
Members
|
|
| |
Calendar
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Promote
|
|
| |
| |
| |  = Owner | |
| |  = Moderator | |
| |  = Online | |
|
|
|
| 1 |
From: carl@a...
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 10:25pm
Subject: Test
|
| |
Just testing the new group.
|
| 2 |
From: Carl Wilson <carl@a...>
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 10:38pm
Subject: Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
|
| |
|
Hello John. I'm replying through the new group. Sorry for the confusion I caused by screwing up the old one.
As too the woo-woos..... I've been thinking it would be nice to ramp up their paranoia a bit. I thought the existence of a "Debunker's Egroup" would do the trick, but apparently we need something more to get them going. Any ideas?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Finally got around to sending my first message to the group.
Thanks to Carl Wilson for starting it.
Now--what shall we have the woo-woos dancing to next?
John
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAR-skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
|
| 3 |
From: John Lewis <10breakalpha@h...>
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 10:47pm
Subject: Testing, Testing...
|
| |
|
Did I make into the Inner Sanctum this time?
John |
|
| 4 |
From: John Lewis <10breakalpha@h...>
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 10:49pm
Subject: Maybe I should...
|
| |
|
Use my FULL name:
Did I make into the Inner Sanctum this time?
John Lewis |
|
| 5 |
From: Carl Wilson <carl@a...>
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 10:43pm
Subject: Re: Testing, Testing...
|
| |
|
Gotcha!
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:47 PM
Subject: [AAR_Skeptics] Testing, Testing...
Did I make into the Inner Sanctum this time?
John
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAR_Skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
|
| 6 |
From: Carl Wilson <carl@a...>
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 10:45pm
Subject: Re: Maybe I should...
|
| |
|
You have in fact reached the Inner Sanctum.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:49 PM
Subject: [AAR_Skeptics] Maybe I should...
Use my FULL name:
Did I make into the Inner Sanctum this time?
John Lewis
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAR_Skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
|
| 7 |
From: John Lewis <10breakalpha@h...>
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 10:57pm
Subject: Re: Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
|
| |
|
Oh, yes indeedy.
How's about intimating that one of us has been meeting with others around the nation, apparently with some sort of mysterious 'backing' that seems to be from sources unknown. Pepper that person's infrequent responses with intimations of knowledge of the 'system' that would be far beyond what could be expected of anyone other than a Gubbint Disinfo Agent.
Should have the folks who think the Xfiles is a documentary series running in circles in short order. Wholeflaffer alone should be shitting his drawers...who knows what the rest will do.
What do you think?
John Lewis
Hello John. I'm replying through the new group. Sorry for the confusion I caused by screwing up the old one.
As too the woo-woos..... I've been thinking it would be nice to ramp up their paranoia a bit. I thought the existence of a "Debunker's Egroup" would do the trick, but apparently we need something more to get them going. Any ideas?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Finally got around to sending my first message to the group.
Thanks to Carl Wilson for starting it.
Now--what shall we have the woo-woos dancing to next?
John
|
|
| 8 |
From: Carl Wilson <carl@a...>
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 11:00pm
Subject: Re: Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
|
| |
|
Now that idea might just do the trick. Which one of us do you think should play the part of the Gubbint Disinfo Agent?
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Oh, yes indeedy.
How's about intimating that one of us has been meeting with others around the nation, apparently with some sort of mysterious 'backing' that seems to be from sources unknown. Pepper that person's infrequent responses with intimations of knowledge of the 'system' that would be far beyond what could be expected of anyone other than a Gubbint Disinfo Agent.
Should have the folks who think the Xfiles is a documentary series running in circles in short order. Wholeflaffer alone should be shitting his drawers...who knows what the rest will do.
What do you think?
John Lewis
Hello John. I'm replying through the new group. Sorry for the confusion I caused by screwing up the old one.
As too the woo-woos..... I've been thinking it would be nice to ramp up their paranoia a bit. I thought the existence of a "Debunker's Egroup" would do the trick, but apparently we need something more to get them going. Any ideas?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Finally got around to sending my first message to the group.
Thanks to Carl Wilson for starting it.
Now--what shall we have the woo-woos dancing to next?
John
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAR_Skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
|
| 9 |
From: John Lewis <10breakalpha@h...>
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 11:21pm
Subject: Re: Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
|
| |
|
It'll have to be someone reasonably unknown to the kook kommunity; possibly an infrequent poster, or someone we can 'dummy up' by changing headers on messages to disguise his true ident.
I personally prefer the second option of creating a sock puppet for the purpose; we can take turns answering, or confer with each other prior to answering. The sweet part of the deal is that we're using the woo-woos own weapon (the sock puppet) against them.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Now that idea might just do the trick. Which one of us do you think should play the part of the Gubbint Disinfo Agent?
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Oh, yes indeedy.
How's about intimating that one of us has been meeting with others around the nation, apparently with some sort of mysterious 'backing' that seems to be from sources unknown. Pepper that person's infrequent responses with intimations of knowledge of the 'system' that would be far beyond what could be expected of anyone other than a Gubbint Disinfo Agent.
Should have the folks who think the Xfiles is a documentary series running in circles in short order. Wholeflaffer alone should be shitting his drawers...who knows what the rest will do.
What do you think?
John Lewis
Hello John. I'm replying through the new group. Sorry for the confusion I caused by screwing up the old one.
As too the woo-woos..... I've been thinking it would be nice to ramp up their paranoia a bit. I thought the existence of a "Debunker's Egroup" would do the trick, but apparently we need something more to get them going. Any ideas?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Finally got around to sending my first message to the group.
Thanks to Carl Wilson for starting it.
Now--what shall we have the woo-woos dancing to next?
John
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAR_Skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAR_Skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
|
| 10 |
From: Carl Wilson <carl@a...>
Date: Sun Nov 11, 2001 11:23pm
Subject: Re: Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
|
| |
|
I think we'll have to employ a sock puppet for this one unless you know of an infrequent poster that would be willing to play along. I do have access to a news server that I don't use. It's my ISP's news server and it pretty much sucks, but it should suffice for these purposes. Whoever wants to play the part could email the messages here and I could pump them out to the newsgroups.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
It'll have to be someone reasonably unknown to the kook kommunity; possibly an infrequent poster, or someone we can 'dummy up' by changing headers on messages to disguise his true ident.
I personally prefer the second option of creating a sock puppet for the purpose; we can take turns answering, or confer with each other prior to answering. The sweet part of the deal is that we're using the woo-woos own weapon (the sock puppet) against them.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Now that idea might just do the trick. Which one of us do you think should play the part of the Gubbint Disinfo Agent?
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Oh, yes indeedy.
How's about intimating that one of us has been meeting with others around the nation, apparently with some sort of mysterious 'backing' that seems to be from sources unknown. Pepper that person's infrequent responses with intimations of knowledge of the 'system' that would be far beyond what could be expected of anyone other than a Gubbint Disinfo Agent.
Should have the folks who think the Xfiles is a documentary series running in circles in short order. Wholeflaffer alone should be shitting his drawers...who knows what the rest will do.
What do you think?
John Lewis
Hello John. I'm replying through the new group. Sorry for the confusion I caused by screwing up the old one.
As too the woo-woos..... I've been thinking it would be nice to ramp up their paranoia a bit. I thought the existence of a "Debunker's Egroup" would do the trick, but apparently we need something more to get them going. Any ideas?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 4:06 PM
Subject: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
Finally got around to sending my first message to the group.
Thanks to Carl Wilson for starting it.
Now--what shall we have the woo-woos dancing to next?
John
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAR_Skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAR_Skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
AAR_Skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
|
| 11 |
From: Bruce Hutchinson <bhutch@g...>
Date: Mon Nov 12, 2001 6:44am
Subject: Re: Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
|
| |
> I think we'll have to employ a sock puppet for this one unless you know of an infrequent poster that would be willing to play along. I do have access to a news server that I don't use. It's my ISP's news server and it pretty much sucks, but it should suffice for these purposes. Whoever wants
to play the part could email the messages here and I could pump them out to the newsgroups.
Hmmm... Do I hear Mary Jo coming out of retirement?
I seem to have missed the weekend fun. Seems Uri got a little
carried away and bent my hard drive instead of a spoon.
I guess this business laptop will have to do for now.
Ok- we need a message from a sock puppet:
Lemme sleep on it. I may have some ideas in the AM.
Bruce
|
| 12 |
From: John Lewis <10breakalpha@h...>
Date: Tue Nov 13, 2001 4:08am
Subject: Re: Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
|
| |
|
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 5:23 PM
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
I think we'll have to employ a sock puppet for this one unless you know of an infrequent poster that would be willing to play along. I do have access to a news server that I don't use. It's my ISP's news server and it pretty much sucks, but it should suffice for these purposes. Whoever wants to play the part could email the messages here and I could pump them out to the newsgroups.
Great idea! We can ALL get in on the act that way. Now--what name shall we use for our mysterious PsyoPerative? (G).
Should be something that fires the woo-woo imagination. How about the nym Lonegard with the name Jim LeMay? I always had a weakness about AF General Curtis LeMay; this could be his Black Ops grandson. He could occasionally slip with something about 'the General, my G-dad', and later backpedal *just* enough to cause endless speculation.
What do you think?
John |
|
| 13 |
From: Carl Wilson <carl@a...>
Date: Tue Nov 13, 2001 5:06am
Subject: Re: Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
|
| |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Hutchinson" <bhutch@g...>
To: <AAR_Skeptics@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:44 AM
Subject: Re: [AAR_Skeptics] Re: [AAR-skeptics] Greetings, all!
>
> > I think we'll have to employ a sock puppet for this one unless you know
of an infrequent poster that would be willing to play along. I do have
access to a news server that I don't use. It's my ISP's news server and it
pretty much sucks, but it should suffice for these purposes. Whoever wants
> to play the part could email the messages here and I could pump them out
to the newsgroups.
>
>
> Hmmm... Do I hear Mary Jo coming out of retirement?
Mary Jo?
>
> I seem to have missed the weekend fun. Seems Uri got a little
> carried away and bent my hard drive instead of a spoon.
I hate it when he does that!
>
> I guess this business laptop will have to do for now.
>
>
>
> Ok- we need a message from a sock puppet:
>
> Lemme sleep on it. I may have some ideas in the AM.
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> AAR_Skeptics-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
|
| 14 |
From: Carl Wilson <carl@a...>
Date: Tue Nov 13, 2001 8:53am
Subject: Fw: The Debunkers have a secret club at yahoo.com!
|
| |
I think Spaz is getting interested in the sock puppet I'm developing! ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chaz Stuart" <Daydisk2@w...>
To: "Shelly Johnston" <shelly_j50@h...>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: The Debunkers have a secret club at yahoo.com!
> Hi,
> My! You stay up as late as do, if you're time thing is correct.
> Yes, I'm afraid you will be called names if you post about your
> abduction. It's up to you if you decide to post. You can tell ME about
> your abduction if you want to.
>
> --Chaz
> PS: Do you also go by Michelle? I seem to remember getting an e-mail
> from a Michelle Johnston a couple years ago.
>
>
|
| 15 |
From: Michael Davis <mdavis19@i...>
Date: Tue Nov 13, 2001 10:57am
Subject: Re: Fw: The Debunkers have a secret club at yahoo.com!
|
| |
Carl Wilson wrote:
I think Spaz is getting interested in the sock
puppet I'm developing! ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chaz Stuart"
To: "Shelly Johnston"
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: The Debunkers have a secret club at yahoo.com!
> Hi,
> My! You stay up as late as do, if you're time thing
is correct.
> Yes, I'm afraid you will be called names if you post about
your
> abduction. It's up to you if you decide to post. You can tell
ME about
> your abduction if you want to.
>
> --Chaz
> PS: Do you also go by Michelle? I seem to remember getting an
e-mail
> from a Michelle Johnston a couple years ago.
>
Looks to me like he is trolling for a date.
--
Michael Davis
|
|
